Skip to main content
Strategy Learning Hub

Strategy #0000000110 · Sustainable finance and rating disagreement

ESG ratings and provider disagreement
Enter three provider scores, a disagreement threshold, assumed basket returns and costs.

ESG rating disagreement can reflect differences in scope, indicator weights, sources and estimation methods rather than simply different views of sustainability performance. Research tests links with returns, risk and investor preferences, but results vary by sample, scales and sector. Separate average rating from disagreement and harmonise scales before comparison.

Beginner-friendlyAbout 8 minutesEvidence and practical analysis

Three ways in

Understand the story. Then inspect the risk.

Start with a familiar situation, check the payoff, then test how the numbers change.

The idea · in two minutes

What basket-return scenario applies when provider disagreement crosses a threshold?

ESG rating disagreement can reflect differences in scope, indicator weights, sources and estimation methods rather than simply different views of sustainability performance. Research tests links with returns, risk and investor preferences, but results vary by sample, scales and sector. Separate average rating from disagreement and harmonise scales before comparison.

Enter three provider scores, a disagreement threshold, assumed basket returns and costs.

No ratings vendor, emissions data or fund holdings are connected; disagreement does not indicate better or worse ESG performance.

  • Input assumptionsEnter three provider scores, a disagreement threshold, assumed basket returns and costs.
  • Model outputNo ratings vendor, emissions data or fund holdings are connected; disagreement does not indicate better or worse ESG performance.

Illustrative research examples only. They are not live signals or a recommendation.

Variants · same family, different risk levers

Data proxies, holding periods and portfolio construction affect signal interpretation.

Compare measurement and implementation assumptions.

Related strategyRelationshipWhat changesNew cost or risk
Base scenarioManual inputsESG rating disagreement can reflect differences in scope, indicator weights, sources and estimation methods rather than simply different views of sustainability performance. Research tests links with returns, risk and investor preferences, but results vary by sample, scales and sector. Separate average rating from disagreement and harmonise scales before comparison.No ratings vendor, emissions data or fund holdings are connected; disagreement does not indicate better or worse ESG performance.
Conservative versionHigher thresholdRaise signal/sample thresholds and reduce exposure.May reduce eligible names.
Validation versionOut-of-sample reviewFreeze definitions before time-ordered evaluation.Needs clean, representative data.

No ratings vendor, emissions data or fund holdings are connected; disagreement does not indicate better or worse ESG performance.

Read beyond the summary

References

Primary sources and research used to describe the strategy and its limits.

  1. 01Gibson Brandon, Krueger & Schmidt (2021), ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returnsresearch