Skip to main content
Strategy Learning Hub

Strategy #0000000026 · Market microstructure and execution

Market making and bid-ask quoting
Change spread, fill probability, adverse selection, fees and inventory haircut to inspect assumed net edge.

Market making and bid-ask quoting converts defined inputs into a rule or allocation. Its scenario illustrates the arithmetic, not validated excess returns.

Beginner-friendlyAbout 8 minutesEvidence and practical analysis

Three ways in

Understand the story. Then inspect the risk.

Start with a familiar situation, check the payoff, then test how the numbers change.

The idea · in two minutes

Market making and bid-ask quoting

A market maker posts bids and asks around a midpoint, hoping to buy lower and sell higher. Rose warns Jack that a fill does not always capture the full spread: after a bid fill, price may keep falling because faster informed traders selected that quote.

As inventory builds, directional exposure grows and the maker may skew quotes or reduce size. Fees, rebates, cancellation latency, queue priority and asymmetric fills all affect outcomes.

The teaching simulation separates two-sided fills, adverse selection, fees and inventory haircut. It does not represent a live order book, actual fill rates or profitability.

  • Quoted spreadQuoted spread: assumed scenario 10; no historical observation is implied.
  • Expected captured spreadExpected captured spread: assumed scenario 3.6; no historical observation is implied.
  • Net after assumed risks/costsNet after assumed risks/costs: assumed scenario 0.7; no historical observation is implied.

Illustrative research examples only. They are not live signals or a recommendation.

Variants · same family, different risk levers

Model settings and execution rules change the result.

These methods share a broad idea, but their estimates and trading assumptions are not interchangeable.

Related strategyRelationshipWhat changesNew cost or risk
Two-sided continuous quotesBasic spread capturePosts bid and ask quotes around a reference price.Inventory and informed flow can overwhelm spread income.
Inventory-skewed quotesPosition-aware pricingShifts quotes as inventory departs from target.A poor fair-value estimate can worsen directional exposure.
Avellaneda–StoikovReservation price and quote widthBalances inventory risk with fill intensity.Model assumptions about arrivals and volatility may fail.
Queue-aware market makingOrder-book positionModels displayed depth and priority at a price level.Queue estimates and cancellations make fills uncertain.

This is simplified one-cycle arithmetic, not a limit-order-book simulation. It omits fill sequencing, queue position, cancellation latency, price jumps and inventory dynamics; multiplying side probabilities assumes independence, which real fills need not satisfy.

Read beyond the summary

References

Primary sources and research used to describe the strategy and its limits.

  1. 01Avellaneda & Stoikov (2008), High-frequency trading in a limit order book.research
  2. 02Kakushadze & Serur (2018), 151 Trading Strategies.source