Skip to main content
Strategy Learning Hub

Strategy #0000000074 · Innovation investment and intangible assets

R&D investment and intangible capital
Calculate R&D/sales and R&D/assets, then compare assumed net returns for high- and low-intensity baskets.

R&D, advertising, brand and organisational capital are accounted for differently from physical assets; expensing may understate long-lived investment. Research finds information in R&D-intensive firms and R&D capital. Intensity can also mean higher uncertainty, and cross-industry comparability is limited. The simulator keeps intensity ratios separate from return assumptions.

Beginner-friendlyAbout 8 minutesEvidence and practical analysis

Three ways in

Understand the story. Then inspect the risk.

Start with a familiar situation, check the payoff, then test how the numbers change.

The idea · in two minutes

How does R&D intensity compare with assumed returns and costs across baskets?

R&D, advertising, brand and organisational capital are accounted for differently from physical assets; expensing may understate long-lived investment. Research finds information in R&D-intensive firms and R&D capital. Intensity can also mean higher uncertainty, and cross-industry comparability is limited. The simulator keeps intensity ratios separate from return assumptions.

Calculate R&D/sales and R&D/assets, then compare assumed net returns for high- and low-intensity baskets.

Expensing, patent quality and development lags affect interpretation; entered returns are assumptions.

  • Signal metricCalculate R&D/sales and R&D/assets, then compare assumed net returns for high- and low-intensity baskets.
  • Assumed return spreadExpensing, patent quality and development lags affect interpretation; entered returns are assumptions.

Illustrative research examples only. They are not live signals or a recommendation.

Variants · same family, different risk levers

Related signals differ in measurement and implementation.

Compare the underlying signal and its limitations.

Related strategyRelationshipWhat changesNew cost or risk
Core measureFundamental sortR&D, advertising, brand and organisational capital are accounted for differently from physical assets; expensing may understate long-lived investment. Research finds information in R&D-intensive firms and R&D capital. Intensity can also mean higher uncertainty, and cross-industry comparability is limited. The simulator keeps intensity ratios separate from return assumptions.Expensing, patent quality and development lags affect interpretation; entered returns are assumptions.
Industry-neutral sortWithin-industry rankingCompare firms with similar operating models.Industry classification and small samples matter.
Quality blendMulti-signal combinationCombine cash flow, profitability or growth.Adds weighting and multiple-testing risk.

Expensing, patent quality and development lags affect interpretation; entered returns are assumptions.

Read beyond the summary

References

Primary sources and research used to describe the strategy and its limits.

  1. 01Chan, Lakonishok & Sougiannis (2001), The Stock Market Valuation of Research and Development Expendituresresearch